#Colegio jean mermoz how to

At the beginning of the 20th century, he called the house “a machine for living” and designed the Maison Citrohan in a clear reference to the automotive industry production line. Le Corbusier was probably the most visible figure amongst the ones who opened a new take on the nature of building.

#Colegio jean mermoz how to

Alberti, in his treatise De Re Aedificatoria, also recognized the “heavy” nature of architecture: “(the architect is who) knows how to realize by construction, whatever can be most beautifully fitted out for the noble needs of man, by the movement of weights and the joining and massing of bodies”. Hence the “work” would be a hand made, unique, one-of-a-kind piece, partially due to the lack of proper molds for its reproduction, but also due to the enormous physical effort involved in its materialization. Also, and from present perspective, it could be said that pyramids embodied the architectural notion of “building” as a kind of heavy-duty and labor-intensive craft, related to frequent visits to the construction site and in-situ making. The inclined plane.” To Mendes da Rocha, the pyramids represented a perfect synthesis that merges form and construction. Maybe ten or eleven years ago, when asked about the “all times most significant work of architecture”, Brazilian architect Paulo Mendes da Rocha pointed out the Egyptian pyramids, because “they are the machine of their own construction. Manufacturing and construction is the title of the last 2012 issue of ARQ: it aims to raise questions on the turning point that the architectural realm faces (or at least does the Latin American one) regarding what it means today to “produce” a building. ARQ 82 | Manufacturing and construction doesn’t feature articles with full english text Editorial.